Prescribing patterns of low-dose aspirin during initial maternity appointments in relation to NICE guideline recommendations: findings from two clinical audits

Dominique Walker | Graham Dark

Pages: 8-12 ⏐ Published: 24 Jan 2025 ⏐ Full text

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70145/MeSh0003

Abstract

Two retrospective audits evaluated prescribing patterns of low-dose aspirin in relation to NICE guideline NG133 recommendations during initial maternity appointments at a Northeast Trust, England. The first audit in September 2021 and the second in September 2022 each included the first 299 patients attending initial maternity appointments during those months. Maternity records were analysed to evaluate aspirin prescriptions for patients at moderate or high risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, and prescription rates were compared between the two audits. In the 2022 audit, 49 patients were identified as meeting NG133 criteria for aspirin use, and only 31 (63%) were prescribed aspirin. Of the 18 patients (37%) not prescribed aspirin, five later received aspirin, leaving 4.5% of the total cohort (13/299) untreated. The 2021 audit showed a similar pattern, with 5.6% of patients (15/266) remaining untreated despite meeting NG133 criteria for aspirin use. Key risk factors applicable to those not prescribed aspirin included ‘nulliparous,' 'BMI >35,' and 'pregnancy interval >10 years.' Remote consultations were linked to inadequate BMI assessment, with 35% of applicable cases not evaluated. The audit highlights the necessity for ongoing efforts to enhance guideline adherence in clinical practice, especially with the growing prevalence of remote consultations. Addressing the identified discrepancies could lead to improved outcomes for pregnant women at risk of hypertensive disorders.

Keywords: NICE guidelines, low-dose aspirin prescription, pregnancy

- Full text -

───────────────────

Popularity trends in UK medical training posts over a 10-year period

Gilbert, P.

Pages: 3-6 ⏐ Published: 09 Sept 2024 ⏐ Full text

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70145/MeSh0002

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of specialty training preferences among doctors completing Foundation Year 2 is important for effective workforce planning and informing medical education policy. Leveraging comprehensive data from NHS digital on medical specialty training posts, applicants, and competition ratios, this descriptive analysis explored trends in specialty popularity over a 10-year period. The analysis revealed that throughout this period, applicant numbers consistently exceeded available training posts, with 68.8% of disciplines experiencing increased competition ratios. This trend reflects a growing applicant pool rather than a decrease in available posts. Post COVID-19, several specialties known for offering a comparatively better work-life balance, including anaesthetics, clinical radiology, core psychiatry, and ophthalmology, saw a significant rise in popularity. This suggests a shift in physician priorities towards specialties providing better work-life balance, likely intensified by the pandemic. Additionally, factors such as public perception and specialty prestige also likely influence specialty training preferences, though further research is needed to fully understand these dynamics.

Keywords: core training, speciality training, medical training, competition ratio

- Full text -

───────────────────

More coming soon…